Archive for the ‘chess books’ Category

Chess Books: Ishi Press announces the Reprinting of My 60 Memorable Games by Bobby Fischer

Saturday, April 11th, 2009

Ishi Press proudly announces the Reprinting of My 60 Memorable Games by Bobby Fischer TODAY

My 60 Memorable Games Selected and fully annotated by Bobby Fischer

With introductions to the games by International Grandmaster Larry Evans

This is an exact reproduction of the original 1969 classic work, “My 60 Memorable Games” by Bobby Fischer. Unfortunately, there have been many efforts by other authors and contributors to “improve” on Fischer’s work by converting the text into algebraic notation and then by correcting what they thought were mistakes in analysis. It turned out that what they thought were mistakes by Fischer were mistakes by themselves. Fischer’s analysis was correct. Their’s was wrong. As a result, Fischer famously went on the radio to denounce those who claimed to have “improved” on his work.

Even since his death, new editions have come out again promising that there have been no changes from the original, but researchers have discovered hundreds of changes in the new editions that supposedly contain no changes.

This book in your hands contains no changes at all on the inside of this book. Every word is the same. Even a typo on the first page has been preserved. The only changes are on this back cover and on the spine.

ISBN 0-923891-58-7
978-0-923891-58-9

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Faves
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • Linkter
  • Live
  • MisterWong
  • MySpace
  • Netvouz
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Related posts

Chess Books Besides The Immortal Game

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

I too really enjoyed the book “The Immortal Game” and while not as exhaustive in detail or on your intellect as Murray’s book it is a very good synopsis of the history of chess. If you enjoyed that one I suggest that you read “The Chess Artist” by J. C. Hallman. It fills in some areas left out by others and delves into FIDE and current issues as well. It does this all while being entertaining and witty.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Faves
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • Linkter
  • Live
  • MisterWong
  • MySpace
  • Netvouz
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Related posts

Chess Books For Beginners

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

You failed to mention the best of the books – “How to Choose a Chess Move” by Andy Soltis. By far, better than Aagaard’s and Purdy’s, and at least as good as Silman’s on a practical level. My opinion, of course, but I know because I’ve read all of them. Soltis’ book is the only one of the four that has garnered the rare highlighter from my hand…

I too have that book. To me, it pales in comparison to the three
I recommended, yet you rated it ‘outstanding.’

This has been my experience in searching for books on any subject:
most books would leave me cold yet another on the same subject
make it so clear. And there is the rub – matching the personalities
of the author to the reader. The only real answer is for the
individual to keep on looking for the Eureka! book.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Faves
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • Linkter
  • Live
  • MisterWong
  • MySpace
  • Netvouz
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Related posts

Chess Books: The Amateur’s Mind by Jeremy Silman

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

Hello fellow beginners!

Have you ever opened a chess book written by an illustrious GM, and found your head swimming within the first three pages? I know I have. It just goes to show you that just because you can play chess at a master level, doesn’t necessarily mean you can teach it or write about it at a high level.

I had heard that IM Jeremy Silman had a reputation for being a world class chess teacher, and that his books were very good for beginners. After beginning working through The Amateur’s Mind, I fully concur with this judgment.

The concept of the book is simple, yet refreshing. The author studied the games of his beginning students, asking them at each turn “Why did you just make that move?” He then synthesizes this information into a concise, easy to use method of examining a given position. This method is great if you, like me, often find yourself playing too fast, and often playing moves that have little or nothing to do with an overall strategic plan.

Silman’s system focuses on teaching the student to recognize and exploit imbalances in a position. Silman lays out seven types of imbalances, and includes a chapter explaining, through the use of student games, how to exploit each. The seven types of imbalances Silman presents are:

  • Minor Pieces – The interplay between Bishops and Knights. For example, if you have two bishops, and your opponent has two knights, you should be trying to open the position. Furthermore, you want to place pawns in such a way as to take away the knights forward positions.
  • Pawn Structure – This chapter deals with passed pawns, isolated pawns, backward pawns, etc.
  • Space – We all know the rule: control the center. But how? And if the center becomes closed, which wing should we play on?
  • Files and Squares – Files, ranks, and diagonals serve as pathways of invasion to our pieces (as well as our opponent’s) and weak squares in our opponent’s camp can serve as homes to our pieces. This chapter explains how (and when) to open a file, how to spot and exploit weak spaces, etc.
  • Development – A lead in development gives you more force in a certain sector of the board. But, this is a temporary imbalance, so use it, or lose it.
  • Initiative – You should always seek to dictate the tempo of a game. This to, is a temporary imbalance.

I think too often, we neophytes fall into several common mental traps. First off, we approach the board looking for “a good move” or even “the best move” without asking ourselves “the best move to what end?” Often, particularly against stronger players, we eventually find ourselves merely passively responding to our opponents threats, while occasionally making harmless threats of our own. I have heard beginners say things like “Always check, it could be mate” and result in “chasing the Queen around.” These traps are a sure way to find yourself at the losing end of the game.

Silman’s method is simple. Look at the board. What are the imbalances? Do you control more or less space? What is the distribution of minor pieces? Are there any weak squares in your opponents position? Can you, or should you, open a file for your rook?

Applying this method does several things. First, it forces you to slow down and examine the board, from both your own and your opponent’s position. Secondly, it allows you to find the weak points in both positions, thereby shoring yours up, and exploiting your opponent’s.

But most importantly, it provides you with a plan. For example “I have bishops, my opponent has knights. Therefore I am going to blast open the center, making my bishops more powerful than his knights.” It also enables you to see what your opponent’s plan should be, making it that much easier to counter.

I understand that Silman deals with these topics, and others, in greater detail in “Reassess Your Chess” and the workbook of the same name. Those of you more advanced may want to start there. But if you are a beginner, if you often find yourself staring at a position wondering what you should do next, then I highly recommend this chess book.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Faves
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • Linkter
  • Live
  • MisterWong
  • MySpace
  • Netvouz
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Related posts

The Immortal Game – A Chess Book

Sunday, March 29th, 2009

Has anyone read the book, The Immortal Game, I loved it! What an unusually exciting chess book.

It has its spots with historical anecdotes sprinkled in here and there, and that is the real appeal of the book, if you can call it that. It’s not really a ‘chess’ book, but more a semi-novel way to connect a played game to the historical record of chess.

As a chess book, it does fail miserably.

A friend of mine had this opinion.

This was, in my opinion, a truly horrible book… in my opinion the most embarrassing “”chess” book in my library of 2500+ books.

It was written by someone who acknowledges that he knows next to nothing about chess or the chess community, and his lack of insight permeates every part of the book. Yes, I really read it… I even went to its NYC book signing, hoping for more.

OK… I have a 2500+ correspondence chess rating… so I fully admit that I didn’t appreciate the book for what is was intended… more of a mass market appeal. Just count me as a lone, disappointed voice.

Jon Edwards

So it definitely depends on your knowledge of the classic game.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • BlogMemes
  • Faves
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkArena
  • Linkter
  • Live
  • MisterWong
  • MySpace
  • Netvouz
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Related posts

Sponsors